Update

My life continues apace. At the moment, I’m looking for a job for the summer and onward (( I will learn the formal rule for when to use onward vs. onwards. )) , hopes fairly high. Going to Hawaii on Tuesday (( Because I am wealthy and carefree. )).

Trends:

  • obsessive behavior
  • competence?
  • health?

An example of the first is the playing of this game. Probably I get in at least one game a day, usually more. A game will usually last an hour, but some games go much longer. Also, my computer is supposed to prevent me from typing/mousing for more than hour, and I will click to bypass its 3 minute break message for hours on end. You read me? Sometimes, say at periods like this when I’m trying to get on to the next thing, I “invest” my mind in the internet, just as during the semester I invested it in academic philosophy. That is, I try to catchup with the flow of information, trends, etc., at least in the domains I care about (mostly opensource software and some world affairs). What really happens is that my hands start hurting and I lose my attention span.

My sense of the second comes from a sudden improvement in my ability to “see” code. I made this portfolio site to show potential employers. It’s in PHP, which I don’t really know, but it’s logic, so I can hack out something like that with a little investigation of the syntax and standard libraries. I’ve also been writing a userspace driver for a usb device (the famous AgileLamp USB Lava Lamp!), which has been a really mysterious, frustrating process where I’ve ended up experimenting with several language bindings for the woefully under-documented libusb library. I ended up falling back to the original C library itself, and found that it’s no more or less understandable as logic than Ruby or Python (although as human-readable code C sucks). So it’s a sense of, if it’s code then it’s hackable. During the spring semester I got this way with writing philosophy papers, since these papers are all supposedly supposed to be publishable. I can take apart a topic and discuss it in a learned fashion for 15+ pages (( Which points to how silly “philosophy” is as a discrete academic domain. So just say this: all knowledge-endeavor is in the domain of philosophy, but not all endeavors are sufficiently philosophically reflective. This means: there shouldn’t be any philosophy grads, but other disciplines should be required to be much deeper about what they’re doing, e.g., law. )). I’d like to get this way with electronics and maybe languages (( I know my best years for this are behind me. sniff )).

By the last I only mean that I really enjoy riding around town on my bike. I have a route to school and can get to a couple interesting neighborhoods from my home. By health I do not mean not eating Jalapeno Cheetoses. Also, Amy and I found a very cheap pizza place that delivers, called Maximum Flavor. Their flavor truly cannot be surpassed. Attempts have been made, and all have failed, with tragic, often fatal, results. Pretty good pizza.

Anyways (( I will learn the formal rule for when to use anyway vs. anyways. )), I’ll try to write here more, generally on more limited, technical topics, because “I’m just not that disclosive” (( As Joe is wont to say about himself )). Look at the timestamp on this post and you’ll get a sense of where I’m at, psychophysically. My wrists hurt and my eyes are burning/droopy.

4 thoughts on “Update

  1. A little googling produces some interesting results. From Bartleby: onwards is an adverb, while onward is both an adjective and an adverb. I had thought it would be similar to “towards” vs “toward,” where I already knew that the rule is nonexistent because it’s just an American vs. British usage question.

    I think I agree on whether there should be philosophy students. Have to hear more about that to be sure.

    Like

  2. A little googling produces some interesting results. From Bartleby: onwards is an adverb, while onward is both an adjective and an adverb. I had thought it would be similar to “towards” vs “toward,” where I already knew that the rule is nonexistent because it’s just an American vs. British usage question.

    I think I agree on whether there should be philosophy students. Have to hear more about that to be sure.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s